Legal Opinion
Diebold Nixdorf, Inc. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 15, 2018No. 2017-2553PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O'malley, Circuit Judge.
*1294 Appellants Diebold Nixdorf, Inc. and Diebold Self-Service Systems (together, "Diebold") appeal the International Trade Commission's ("ITC" or "Commission") finding that they violated § 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 by importing components of automated teller machines ("ATMs") that infringe claims 1-3, 6, 8, and 9 of U.S. Patent No. 8,523,235 ("the '235 patent"). Diebold challenges the Commission's determination that these claims, all of which recite the term "cheque standby unit," are not invalid for indefiniteness. See Certain Automated Teller Machines, ATM Modules,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Teva Pharm. United States, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Richard Williamson v. Citrix Online, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- John D. Watts v. Xl Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- I. Melbourne Greenberg, M.D. v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Noah Systems, Inc. v. Intuit Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Tek Global, S.R.L., Tek Corp. v. Sealant Sys. Int'l, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Mtd Products Inc. v. IancuCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Fintiv, Inc. v. Paypal Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2025
- Cypress Lake Software, Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Am., Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2019
- 360Heros, Inc. v. GoPro, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2019
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.