Encinas v. Mangum
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANKFORD, Judge.
¶ 1 In this special action, Petitioner Herb Encinas challenges the superior court’s order allowing a non-lawyer to ask questions and make arguments on behalf of his mother. Petitioner contends this order improperly permits the unauthorized practice of law. By order, we previously accepted jurisdiction and granted relief, indicating that a decision would follow. Our decision holds that the order was improper because it is inconsistent with the supreme court’s exercise of its exclusive jurisdiction over who may practice law in Arizona.
¶ 2 The underlying case is a contract…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State Bar of Arizona v. Arizona Land Title & Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1961
- Connor v. Cal-Az Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Hunt v. Maricopa County Employees Merit System CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- Bloch v. BentfieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State ex rel. Arizona Department of Health Services v. GottsfieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF HEALTH v. GottsfieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Murray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2002
- Gabris v. GabrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019