Legal Opinion
Bryant v. Noether
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided March 30, 2001No. CIV. 00-191-MPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
McAULIFFE, District Judge.
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and New Hampshire common law, Richard Bryant seeks redress for alleged violations of his civil and common law rights arising from his arrest and prosecution for assaulting his wife. Two motions are before the court: (1) Defendant Lauren Noether’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings: Prosecutorial Immunity (document no. 14), and (2) Defendants Lauren Noether’s, Stephen Hodges’s, and Richard Batstone’s (collectively, the “county defendants”) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings & For Summary Judgment: Qualified Immunity and Collateral…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gutierrez v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Forest v. Pawtucket Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2003
- Menebhi v. MattosDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2002
- Brandon Velez, Plaintiff v. Rachael Eutzy, Erik Slocum, Casey Seigle, and The City of Manchester, N.H., DefendantsDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2024
- Collins v. City of ManchesterDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.