Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Stutsman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 29, 1999No. OBAD No. 1357. SCBD No. 4345PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOpala, J.

¶ 1 In this disciplinary proceeding against a lawyer, the issues to be decided are: (1) Does the record submitted for our examination provide sufficient evidence for a mean*857ingful de novo consideration of the complaint’s disposition?1 and (2) Is a one-year suspension an appropriate disciplinary sanction for respondent’s breach of professional ethics? We answer both questions in the affirmative.

I

INTRODUCTION TO THE RECORD

¶2 The Oklahoma Bar Association [Bar] charged Richard Stutsman [Stutsman or Respondent], a licensed lawyer, with four counts of professional misconduct.2 The Bar later amended…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. EakinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. In Re Integration of State Bar of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. FarrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  2. McQueen, Rains & Tresch, LLP v. CITGO Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  3. State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RoweSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  4. State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. BergerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API