Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Falanga v. Boylan

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 15, 2015No. 14-159Published

1Concurrence

Morse, J. (Ret.),

Specially Assigned, concurring.

I have long maintained that the two-step formula mandated by the Court for modification of custody in relocation disputes achieves nothing but “needlessly complex and artificial” decisions. Gazo v. Gazo, 166 Vt. 434, 450, 697 A.2d 342, 351 (1997) (Morse, J., concurring). Under this approach, courts ostensibly must first determine whether there has been a “substantial change of circumstances” as a precondition to determining whether the child’s “best interests” warrant a modification of parental rights and responsibilities.3 The difficulty is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lane v. SchenckSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  2. Gazo v. GazoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  3. Hawkes v. SpenceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  4. Knutsen v. CEGALISSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  5. Hazlett v. ToominSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API