Legal Opinion

Lane v. Schenck

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 22, 1992No. 91-447PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

Plaintiff-mother appeals a family court order modifying her parental rights and responsibilities (custody) by imposing a condition that she reside in a location requiring no more than a four-hour drive from defendant-father’s residence. The modification was the court’s response to father’s request for custody of the couple’s three children after mother announced her intent to attend law school in Iowa. We must decide what standard applies in a proceeding brought under 15 V.S.A. § 668 (modification of custody) when, without agreement, a custodial parent decides to move a significant distance…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Auge v. AugeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. D'Onofrio v. D'OnofrioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  3. Holder v. PolanskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  4. McComb v. WambaughCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  5. Kilduff v. WilleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Mullin v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  2. Hoover (Letourneau) v. HooverSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  3. Ireland v. IrelandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  4. DeBeaumont v. GoodrichSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  5. Shea v. MetcalfSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API