Hawkes v. Spence
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtReiber, J.
¶ 1. In each of these two separate cases, 3 the family court determined that a divorced parent seeking to prevent the other parent from moving out of state with the parties’ children failed to meet the threshold requirement for modifying parental rights and responsibilities by showing a real, substantial and unanticipated change of circumstances. The family court’s decisions in these cases highlight the need for us to clarify an area of the law governing seemingly irreconcilable conflicts in which the custodial parent’s interest in building a new life with the children is often pitted against…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- MATTER OF TROPEA v. TropeaNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Hoover (Letourneau) v. HooverSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- Ireland v. IrelandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- DeBeaumont v. GoodrichSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
- Lane v. SchenckSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Rogers v. ParrishSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- Nicola Weaver v. David WeaverSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- Chickanosky v. ChickanoskySupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- Heidi Corcoran Wener v. Erik WenerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- Paine v. BuffaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.