Legal Opinion

Knutsen v. CEGALIS

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 10, 2009No. 2008-256PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.

¶ 1. Mother appeals the Rutland Family Court order awarding her primary rights and responsibilities of the parties’ minor child until March 1, 2010, at which time the rights *102and responsibilities automatically shift to father for the remainder of the child’s minority. On appeal, mother contends that the order’s provision automatically shifting the rights and responsibilities to father is unlawful and that we are compelled by principles of res judicata to order that she retain primary rights and responsibilities to the child indefinitely. We agree that the provision in question is unlawful, but…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cabot v. CabotSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  2. DeBeaumont v. GoodrichSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  3. Posporelis v. PosporelisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Lane v. SchenckSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  5. Roberts v. RobertsIdaho Supreme Court · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. DeSantis v. PeguesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  2. Knutsen v. CegalisSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  3. Mar-Rae X. Terino v. Thomas F. BleeksSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  4. Engel v. EngelSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  5. Jody LaFlam v. Diana LaFlamSupreme Court of Vermont · 2022

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API