Legal Opinion
Tammy Rosebrough v. Buckeye Valley High School
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 8, 2012No. 10-4057PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JANE B. STRANCH, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Tammy Rosebrough appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant Buckeye Valley High School in her suit alleging discrimination and disparate treatment under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., and the Ohio Revised Code, § 4112.02 et seq., and alleg ing intentional infliction of emotional distress. The district court held for Buckeye Valley on all claims based solely on the finding that Rosebrough was not a qualified individual under the ADA. For the following reasons, we REVERSE…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Donald G. Wexler v. White's Fine Furniture, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Miller v. CurrieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Steven Ondo v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Williams v. MTA Bus Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
- David Neely v. Benchmark Family ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Parker v. Strawser Constr., Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2018
- Belasco v. Warrensville Heights City SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.