Legal Opinion

State v. Dow

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 5, 2008No. 34802-1-IIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 — The State appeals an order dismissing first degree child molestation charges against Keith Ian Dow.

Quinn-Brintnall, J.

¶2 RCW 10.58.035 provides that a defendant’s trustworthy statement may be admitted as substantive evidence when the alleged victim of a crime has died or is incompetent to testily at trial. Finding this statute unconstitutional, the trial court refused to apply it and required that the State prove corpus delicti through independent evidence before admitting Dow’s trustworthy statements. When the State failed to supply such evidence, the trial court dismissed the charges.…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Bram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. DowWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. DowWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State Of Washington v. Zaida Cardenas-floresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  4. State Of Washington v. Zaida Cardenas-floresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  5. State v. DowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API