Legal Opinion

State Of Washington v. Zaida Cardenas-flores

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 14, 2016No. 46605-8-IIPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorswick, J.

¶1 — A jury returned a verdict finding Zaida Cardenas-Flores guilty of second degree assault of a child. Cardenas-Flores appeals her conviction, asserting that (1) the State failed to establish the corpus delicti of second degree assault of a child with evidence independent of her statements to police, (2) the State failed to present sufficient evidence that she intentionally assaulted the victim, (3) the State failed to prove jurisdiction was proper with sufficient evidence that the crime had occurred in Washington, (4) the trial court’s jury instruction defining “assault” relieved the State…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. State v. CamarilloWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. EmeryWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. ReichenbachWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. ReichenbachWashington Supreme Court · 2004

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McCoy v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
  2. State v. Cardenas-FloresWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State Of Washington v. Buddy L. BoyerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  4. State Of Washington v. Tomas M. GasparCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  5. State Of Washington v. William Lewis RichardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API