Legal Opinion

State v. Dow

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 2010No. 81243-8PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

227 P.3d 1278 (2010)

168 Wash.2d 243

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Keith Ian DOW, Petitioner.

No. 81243-8.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued May 14, 2009.

Decided February 11, 2010.

John A. Hays, Attorney at Law, Longview, WA, for Petitioner.

Amie L. Hunt, Cowlitz County Prosecutor's Office, Kelso, WA, for Respondent.

C. JOHNSON, J.

¶ 1 This case involves a challenge to the application of RCW 10.58.035, a statute concerning the corpus delicti rule. RCW 10.58.035 permits a lawfully obtained and otherwise admissible statement of a defendant to be admitted when independent proof of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. State v. KnapstadWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. United States v. Raul Lopez-AlvarezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. State v. AtenWashington Supreme Court · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State of Tennessee v. Courtney BishopTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. DernSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  3. State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. State v. HummelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  5. State v. MeneeseWashington Supreme Court · 2012

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API