Legal Opinion

Matter of Discipline of Dillon

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 26, 1985No. C3-84-1250PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The Director of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board (LPRB) filed a petition for disciplinary action against respondent, Thomas C. Dillon, charging him with several violations of the Minnesota Code of Professional Responsibility (MCPR). The referee appointed by this court found facts supporting all of the alleged violations and made recommendations for discipline.

Dillon has been licensed to practice law in Minnesota since 1963 and currently practices in Fairbault. A review of the referee’s findings, which are basically uncontested, reveals that all of Dillon’s alleged code violations…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against GeigerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  2. In Re the Discipline of HartkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  3. Matter of Discipline of BealSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against NeillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  5. In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Larry S. SEVERSON, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 99363Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API