Legal Opinion
Smith v. Holder
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 22, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2010-1302PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is plaintiffs motion to accept her Complaint as timely filed on July 30, 2010 and defendant’s motion to dismiss the plaintiffs Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to file in a timely manner. For the reasons explained below, the defendant’s motion to dismiss has been converted to a motion for summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 and is denied. The Court equitably tolls the statute of limitations period and accepts the Complaint as timely filed on August 2,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Roy E. Bowden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Smith-Haynie, J. C. v. Davis, AddisonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ayala v. Tito Contractors, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Smith v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Jordon v. QuanderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Escamilla v. NuyenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Brown v. VilsackCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.