Copsey v. Sacramento Bank
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
Plaintiff was the owner of a tract of land, and as security for the payment of a debt owing to the Sacramento Bank, she transferred the title thereof by deed of trust to Coleman and Hamilton as trustees. Having failed to satisfy the debt when due, the trustees sold the property to the bank, and a deed to it followed. The present action is brought to set aside the sale and cancel the deed, upon the ground that the sale was void. A demurrer was sustained to the complaint, and the sufficiency of plaintiff’s pleading in her allegations of fact is the question presented upon this appeal.
Equitable…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Buell v. Buckingham & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1864
- Kitchen v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1878
- Broder v. ConklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Thornton v. IrwinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Karlsen v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Mid-Century Insurance v. GardnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Humboldt Sav. Bank v. McClevertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Flores v. EMC Mortgage Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2014
- Herbert Kraft Co. v. BryanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.