Legal Opinion
Gaiennie Co. v. Chisolm
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 4, 1926No. 9090PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
The appeal in this case is from a judgment maintaining an exception of no cause of action. At the hearing on appeal, counsel for all parties to the appeal submitted the following written admissions:
“It is admitted that Gaiennie & Co., Ltd., were sub-contractors of Chisolm & Company, who was the general contractor; and it is further admitted all questions of misjoinder and nonjoinder are waived, and the only question to be decided is whether a general contractor can be considered as a third person under the provisions of Sections 6 and 7 of the Compensation Act.”
It was also admitted in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- London Guarantee & Accident Ins. v. Vicksburg, S. & P. R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
- Foster & Glassell Co. v. Knight Bros.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Helton v. Tall Timber Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
- Clementine v. RitchieLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1924
- Haynes v. BernhardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sanderson v. Binnings Construction CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- McCastle v. Architectural Stone Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
- Ranson-Rooney v. Overseas Railway, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
- Franklin v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1943
- Boehm v. WitteNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.