Legal Opinion

Gaiennie Co. v. Chisolm

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 4, 1926No. 9090PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

The appeal in this case is from a judgment maintaining an exception of no cause of action. At the hearing on appeal, counsel for all parties to the appeal submitted the following written admissions:

“It is admitted that Gaiennie & Co., Ltd., were sub-contractors of Chisolm & Company, who was the general contractor; and it is further admitted all questions of misjoinder and nonjoinder are waived, and the only question to be decided is whether a general contractor can be considered as a third person under the provisions of Sections 6 and 7 of the Compensation Act.”

It was also admitted in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. London Guarantee & Accident Ins. v. Vicksburg, S. & P. R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  2. Foster & Glassell Co. v. Knight Bros.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  3. Helton v. Tall Timber Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  4. Clementine v. RitchieLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. Haynes v. BernhardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sanderson v. Binnings Construction CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. McCastle v. Architectural Stone Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Ranson-Rooney v. Overseas Railway, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Franklin v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Boehm v. WitteNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API