Legal Opinion

Foster & Glassell Co. v. Knight Bros.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 30, 1922No. 25421PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDawkins, J.

Plaintiff alleges that it was the employer of one Pink Morris, who, at the end of certain litigation, obtained a judgment for compensation against it under the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Act No. 20 of 1914). After having paid the said judgment, plaintiff brought this suit for indemnification against Knight Bros., alleging that the injuries to Morris were caused through their fault and negligence. The petition alleges that the compensation which it had to pay was “from November 24, 1917,” and which, presumably, was the date of the injury.

Defendant filed a plea of prescription of one year…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Appalachian Corp. v. Brooklyn Cooperage Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Minyard v. Curtis Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1967
  2. Gulf, Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. Arthur Dixon Transfer Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1951
  3. Marquette Casualty Company v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  4. Crab Orchard Improvement Co. v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
  5. Raymond D. Louviere v. Shell Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API