Legal Opinion

London Guarantee & Accident Ins. v. Vicksburg, S. & P. R.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 26, 1923No. 23695PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Niell, C. J.

Plaintiff has appealed from a judgment dismissing this suit on an exception of no cause -or right of action.

In determining whether plaintiff has a cause or right of action, we take the allegations of the petition as the facts of the case. Being an insurance company, engaged in issuing enxployers’ liability insurance, plaintiff issued a policy to the Arnold Construction Company covering any and all accidents that might happen to any of the employees engaged in the construction of a roundhouse for the defendant railroad company. The Arnold Construction Company was an independent contractor, not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Appalachian Corp. v. Brooklyn Cooperage Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  2. Foster & Glassell Co. v. Knight Bros.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  3. City of Shreveport v. Southwestern Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1917

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Great SW Fire Ins. Co. v. CNA Ins. CompaniesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  2. Marquette Casualty Company v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  3. Forcum-James Co. v. Duke Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  4. National Surety Corp. v. Standard Accident Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
  5. Raymond D. Louviere v. Shell Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API