Legal Opinion

Moore v. Jamieson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 19, 1973No. Appeals, 245 and 246PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Nix,

The petitioner, Cecil B. Moore, Esq., a member of the bar of Pennsylvania whose practice consists chiefly of representing criminal defendants in the City of Philadelphia, seeks a writ of prohibition against the enforcement of Rule *301 of the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas. That rule1 prohibits an attorney who represents ten or more criminal defendants whose indictments are over twelve months old from entering an appearance in any additional criminal cases.2 On De-

*302cember 13, 1972, we granted an order of supersedeas pending the disposition of this petition.

By way of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RadeckiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Parker v. Children's Hospital of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. SzuchonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Pirillo v. PirilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API