Clark County Public Employees Ass'n v. Pearson
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*589OPINION
By the Court,
Rose, J.:
The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the district court erred in determining that the parties’ three labor disputes are not arbitrable under the parties’ collective bargaining agreement. Appellant has pointed to provisions of the collective bargaining agreement which at least arguably cover these disputes, but whether the parties intended these disputes to be arbitrable is not certain. Precisely because the question of arbitra-bility is in doubt, however, we hold that the district court’s order staying arbitration must be reversed and this case…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Futures, Inc. v. BarrIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Exber, Inc. v. Sletten Construction CompanyNevada Supreme Court · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Sheehan & Sheehan v. Nelson Malley & Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
- Musser v. Bank of AmericaNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- Kindred v. Second Judicial District Court of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2000
- Nga 2 Limited Liability Co. v. RainsNevada Supreme Court · 1997
- State Ex Rel. Masto v. SECOND JUDICIAL DIST. CT.Nevada Supreme Court · 2009
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.