Sheehan & Sheehan v. Nelson Malley & Co.
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Gibbons, J.:
In these consolidated appeals, we primarily consider whether the district court properly construed a contractual covenant not to compete and a corresponding liquidated damages clause. We conclude that the district court erred as a matter of law in awarding liquidated damages, and we therefore reverse that part of the judgment. We affirm the remainder of the judgment and the order awarding attorney fees and costs.
FACTS
William and Thomas Sheehan are brothers who operated an accounting firm, appellant Sheehan & Sheehan, a Nevada Professional Corporation, in…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gallego v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001
- Sandy Valley Associates v. Sky Ranch Estates Owners Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 2001
- Kaldi v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 2001
- Bobby Berosini, Ltd. v. People for the Ethical Treatment of AnimalsNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- Traffic Control Services, Inc. v. United Rentals Northwest, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- M.C. Multi-Family Development, L.L.C. v. Crestdale Associates, Ltd.Nevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Bower v. Harrah's Laughlin, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2009
- Righthaven Llc v. Wayne HoehnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- In Re Amerco Derivative LitigationNevada Supreme Court · 2011
- Glenbrook Capital Ltd. Partnership v. DoddsNevada Supreme Court · 2011
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.