Barber v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*250BROSKY, Judge:
This is a consolidated appeal from orders granting appel-lee’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing appellants’ complaint.
Appellants are present or former employees of appellee, Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, and spouses of these employees and have alleged in their complaint that they or their spouse suffer from asbestosis which was intentionally inflicted upon them by appellee. The action seeks damages for personal injury and loss of spousal consortium.
The trial court, in a lengthy opinion, sets forth its reasons for granting appellee’s motion concluding that the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Blankenship v. Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
- Poyser v. Newman & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Tsarnas v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Hefferin v. StempkowskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Field v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Barber v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- B.T.Z., Inc. v. GroveDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Mentzer v. OgnibeneCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Malia v. RCA Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.