Legal Opinion

Couturier v. Penobscot Indian Nation

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 13, 1988PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLIFFORD, Justice.

Plaintiffs Merlene and Ronald Couturier appeal from an order of the Superior Court, Penobscot County, dismissing their com plaint against the Penobscot Indian Nation and Mark Sockbeson, a police officer employed by the Penobscot Nation. The Superior Court determined that plaintiffs’ suit was time barred under 14 M.R.S.A. § 8110 (1980), the two-year statute of limitations provision of the Maine Tort Claims Act. Because we determine that plaintiffs should have been afforded the opportunity to demonstrate that Sockbeson was not acting in a “governmental capacity” within the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. John S. Bottomly v. Passamaquoddy TribeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  3. Davies v. City of BathSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  4. Faucher v. City of AuburnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  5. Patten v. MilamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. BootsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  2. Great Northern Paper, Inc. v. Penobscot NationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  3. United States v. LazoreCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API