Legal Opinion

Patten v. Milam

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 12, 1983PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATHEN, Justice.

Plaintiff Irene Patten obtained judgment in the Superior Court (Hancock County) as a result of a jury verdict finding defendant Robert E. Milam liable for medical malpractice. Defendant appeals, arguing that the Superior Court wrongfully denied his motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground of the statute of limitations. 1 Further, he contends that the action is barred by plaintiff’s failure to serve the written notice of claim required by 24 M.R.S.A. § 2903 (Supp.1982-1983) and that the presiding justice erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict on the issues of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Drew v. DrewSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1854
  2. Connolly v. SerunianSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1941
  3. Bucknam v. ThompsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1854

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Chiapetta v. Clark AssociatesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
  2. Patten v. MilamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  3. Townsend v. Chute Chemical Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
  4. Angell v. HALLEESupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  5. Hanusek v. Southern Maine Medical CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API