Legal Opinion

John S. Bottomly v. Passamaquoddy Tribe

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 17, 1979No. 78-1515PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COFFIN, Chief Judge.

This is a diversity action brought by an attorney against the Passamaquoddy Tribe and three of its former tribal governors to recover on a contingency contract for attorney’s fees. After argument on a defense motion to dismiss, the district court found that the Tribe and its officers were protected from suit by the doctrine of sovereign immunity, Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez, 436 U.S. 49, 98 S.Ct. 1670, 56 L.Ed.2d 106 (1978); Puyallup Tribe v. Washington Department of Game, 433 U.S. 165, 97 S.Ct. 2616, 53 L.Ed.2d 667 (1977), and accordingly dismissed for want of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Oneida Indian Nation v. County of OneidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Rhode Island v. Narragansett Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. Native Village of Eyak v. GC ContractorsAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Akins v. Penobscot IndianCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  5. Mohegan Tribe v. State of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API