Elliott v. Farm Bureau Ins. Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Larson, J.:
This appeal involves interpretation of the wage loss provisions of an automobile insurance contract. Gary D. Elliott appeals from the trial court’s decision that his recovery from Farm Bureau Insurance Company, Inc., (Farm Bureau) is limited to 85% of his loss of monthly earnings and from the reconsideration of an earlier ruling.
Elliott had purchased automobile insurance coverage from Farm Bureau. The policy provided for loss of earnings benefits to compensate for lost wages, with a limitation of “85% of loss of monthly earnings unless [the wage loss benefits were] required to be…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Old Hickory Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
- State v. LeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
- City of Topeka v. Watertower Place Development GroupSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. HorinekSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jones v. Reliable Security Incorporation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2001
- Cashman Ex Rel. Cashman v. CherrySupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- Loucks v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2004
- Atlantic Avenue Associates v. Central Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2001
- Burchett v. Kansas Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.