Paoletti v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Presiding Judge
This appeal is from a judgment in a wrongful employment discharge action, and the denial of a motion for a new trial or judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Appellants claim that before respondent-employee may pursue a claim against his employer for violation of a collective bargaining agreement he must first prove his union breached its duty of fair representation by electing not to submit his wrongful discharge grievance to arbitration. We reverse.
FACTS
Respondent Quentin Paoletti was employed by appellant Northwestern Bell Telephone Company as a cable…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Avco Corp. v. Aero Lodge No. 735, International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sonenstahl v. L.E.L.S., Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Allen v. Hennepin CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Paoletti v. ZlimenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Allen v. Hennepin CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004