Legal Opinion

Paoletti v. Zlimen

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 9, 1986No. C8-86-1314PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from a summary judgment on a legal malpractice claim alleging re spondent’s negligence in failing to advise appellant of the statute of limitations applicable to the underlying wrongful discharge claim. Appellant claims the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because he established a prima facie case of legal malpractice, showing respondent’s alleged negligence prevented appellant from properly litigating his underlying suit. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Quentin E. Paoletti was discharged from his employment with Northwestern Bell Telephone…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Christy v. SalitermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  5. Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & KeefeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Friesens, Inc. v. LarsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Friesens, Inc. v. LarsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Friesens, Inc. v. LarsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API