Legal Opinion

Connell v. Superior Court of Sacramento County

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 20, 1997No. C024295PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, J.

This case involves a dispute as to whether a statewide regulatory amendment, increasing the level of purity required when reclaimed waste-water is used for certain types of irrigation, constitutes a state-mandated program for which water districts are entitled to reimbursement from the state. (Cal. Const., art. XIII B, § 6 (hereafter, section 6); Gov. Code, § 17500 et seq.; former Rev. & Tax. Code, § 2201 et seq.) The State Controller and State Treasurer appeal from a trial court judgment granting petitions for writ of mandate brought by Santa Margarita Water District (SMWD),…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Morehart v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Lyon v. GossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. County of Los Angeles v. Commission on State MandatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Esslinger v. CumminsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Seligsohn v. DayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Hedwall v. PCMV, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. Clovis Unified School District v. ChiangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API