Legal Opinion
Seligsohn v. Day
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 31, 2004No. A104117PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HAERLE, Acting P. J.
I. INTRODUCTION
Appellants Michael Seligsohn and Ray Castillo, both police officers employed by City College of San Francisco (College), a community college, appeal from a judgment of the San Francisco Superior Court denying their petition for a writ of mandate and complaint for declaratory relief seeking disclosure of complaints filed against each of them with the College’s Office of Affirmative Action. We reverse.
II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In September 2001, appellant Castillo was assigned to investigate matters pertaining to a faculty member at the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Burden v. SnowdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Williams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Pasadena Police Officers Assn. v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- City of Hemet v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Poole v. Orange County Fire AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Lozada v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Gilbert v. City of SunnyvaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- People v. SalcidoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.