Allington & Curtis Manuf'g Co. v. Lynch
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut
This was a suit in equity by the Allington & Curtis Manufacturing Company and others against Arthur C. Lynch and George W. Christoph for alleged infringement of certain patents for improvements in dust collectors.
1Opinion of the Court
TOWNSEND, District Judge.
The complainants herein ask for a preliminary injunction against the infringement of the following *410claims of the following patents, namely: Claims 1, 2, and 3 of No. 403,362, claims 1 and 2 of No. 403,363, claim 4 of No. 403,770, and. claim 4 of No. 409,465. These patents cover improvements in dust collectors, and all of them were granted in 1889. Title in complainants and infringement are proved. The validity of these claims was sustained by Judge Grosscup in April, 1894, after a protracted and thorough hearing. Knickerbocker Co. v. Rogers, 61 Fed. 297.
The sole…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Electric Manuf'g Co. v. Edison Electric Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
- Edison Electric Light Co. v. Beacon Vacuum Pump & Electrical Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1893
- Philadelphia Trust, Safe-Deposit & Insurance v. Edison Electric Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1895
- Knickerbocker Co. v. RogersDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1894
- Edison Electric Light Co. v. Electric Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bowers v. San Francisco Bridge Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1898
- Allington & Curtis Manuf'g Co. v. BoothU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Vermont · 1896
- Allington & Curtis Mfg. Co. v. GlorU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1897