Legal Opinion

Knickerbocker Co. v. Rogers

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 30, 1894PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Suit by the Knickerbocker Company against Ward I!. Rogers and others to restrain the infringement of a patent.

1Opinion of the Court

GROSSCUP, District Judge.

The complainant claims under letters patent issued to Orville M. Morse, Nos. 403,362, 403,363, 403,770, and 408,987. Claim 2 of letters patent 403,363 is as follows:

“A dust collector, consisting of a tapering separating chamber having an imperforate peripheral wall, in which the whirling body of air forms a vortex, and in which the air moves from the periphery towards the axis of the vortex as it becomes freed from the solid matter; said chamber having at its large end a tangential inlet for the dust-laden air, and a discharge aperture for the purified air opening…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stead Lens Co. v. Kryptok Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
  2. Kryptok Co. v. Stead Lens Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1913
  3. Parker v. SteblerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910
  4. Allington & Curtis Manuf'g Co. v. BoothCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
  5. National Meter Co. v. Thomson Meter Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API