Legal Opinion

Allington & Curtis Mfg. Co. v. Glor

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York

Decided December 13, 1897No. 6,129Published

This was a suit in equity by the Allington & Curtis Manufacturing Company and others against Peter Glor and others for alleged infringement of four patents for improvements in dust collectors.

1Opinion of the Court

COXE, District Judge (orally).

This, action is based upon four letters for improvements in dust collectors. They are No. *1015103,362, granted May 14, 1889; No. 403,9,63, granted May 14, 1889; No. 409, !65, granted August 20, 1889, and No. 407,598. granted July 23, 1889. The title to all of these patents is proved, by satisfactory evidence, to be vested in the complainants. The first three have been the subject of adjudication in the Northern district of Illinois, in the district of Connecticut and in the district of Vermont. All of the claims now involved were, there passed upon and upheld.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Allington & Curtis Manuf'g Co. v. BoothCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
  3. Knickerbocker Co. v. RogersDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1894
  4. Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Elmira & Horseheads Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1895
  5. Allington & Curtis Manuf'g Co. v. LynchU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API