Teeter v. City of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
This action was instituted for the purpose of rescinding a deed by which plaintiff conveyed to the City of Los Angeles an easement over her property for street purposes and to enjoin the city and G. W. Ellis from carrying out the terms of a contract for the doing of work called for by certain ordinances of the City of Los Angeles, partially on the property deeded by plaintiff to the city. It is also asked that the ordinances in question be declared null and void. The two ordinances above mentioned were passed and adopted by the City of Los Angeles in furtherance of proceedings taken under the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Blake v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- San Joaquin & Kings River Canal & Irrigation Co. v. County of StanislausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by18 opinions
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Metcalf v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Department of Fish & Game v. Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Bleeck v. State Board of OptometryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Palo Alto-Menlo Park Yellow Cab Co. v. Santa Clara County Transit DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.