Legal Opinion

Labruce v. City of North Charleston

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 4, 1977No. 20416PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

Appellants instituted this action for the recovery of business license taxes paid under protest. The trial court sustained the respondent’s demurrer finding a defect of parties defendant. We affirm.

Appellants are businessmen and professionals operating within the corporate limits of the City of North Charleston. On February 13, 1975, the City enacted its Business License Ordinance and assessed the taxes. Appellants paid the assessments under protest and instituted this action pursuant to Section 65-2661 et seq., Code of Laws, 1962. Section 65-2663 provides:

“The remedies and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bomar v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
  2. Elmwood Cemetery Ass'n v. WassonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
  3. Ex Parte WessingerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  4. Perpetual Building & Loan Ass'n v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clear Channel Outdoor v. City of Myrtle BeachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  2. Horry County v. City of Myrtle BeachCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  3. Donald Simmons v. Danhauer & Associates LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  4. Goethe ex rel. Estate of Goethe v. ClelandCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  5. Duerr v. Richland CountyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API