Legal Opinion
Lewkut v. Stryker Corp.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided June 26, 2010No. 5:09-po-03695PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KEITH P. ELLISON, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss of Defendant Howmedica Osteonics Corp. (“Defendant”) (Doc. No. 8). After considering the parties’ filings, all responses and replies thereto, and the applicable law, the Court finds that Defendant’s motion should be granted.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
A. Facts of this Case
Plaintiff Egon Lewkut (“Plaintiff’) received an artificial hip replacement system manufactured by Defendant on or about November 15, 2006 in Ann Arbor, Michigan. (PI. First Am. Compl., Doc. No. 5, ¶ 2.) This replacement system,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Collins v. Morgan Stanley Dean WitterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Alton Bass v. Stryker CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Gross v. Stryker Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Simon v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Huskey v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2014
- Bertini v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.