Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Woodrich

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1977No. SC 24825PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*33HOLMAN, J.

In this mandamus proceeding we are asked to reconsider our decision in Shepard v. Bowe, 250 Or 288, 442 P2d 238 (1968). Defendant circuit judge relied on Shepard in refusing to allow state psychiatrists to question a criminal defendant concerning acts or conduct at or immediately near the time of the commission of the alleged crimes. The state contends that since the criminal defendant intends to raise the defense of mental disease or defect and to introduce evidence of extreme emotional disturbance, defendant circuit judge has the duty to order a complete psychiatric examination.

Sin…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Shepard v. BoweOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. SmallwoodOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. MurrayOregon Supreme Court · 1884
  5. State v. PhillipsOregon Supreme Court · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. SorianoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  2. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. State ex rel. Ott v. CushingOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. AllardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  5. State v. ZielinskiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API