Legal Opinion

State v. Zielinski

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 20, 2017No. 11C40365; A155888PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction, entered after a conditional guilty plea, for one count of murder with a firearm, ORS 163.115, ORS 161.610. Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s exclusion of expert testimony that defendant had been diagnosed with an anxiety disorder, which he offered in support of a defense of extreme emotional disturbance (EED). We conclude that the trial court erred in excluding expert testimony that defendant had been diagnosed with an anxiety disorder. Accordingly, we reverse and remand.

The facts, which are largely procedural, are undisputed. Defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. WilleOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. OttOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. WoodrichOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. CountsOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State ex rel. Department of Human Services v. R. N. L.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. CraigenOregon Supreme Court · 2023
  2. State v. CraigenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. State v. CraigenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. State v. ZielinskiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  5. State v. CourtierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API