Legal Opinion
Sandella v. Dick Corp.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 11, 1999No. AC 17504PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
This appeal arises from the judgment on a cross claim for indemnification. In the main action, a jury found the defendant Dick Corporation and the defendant cross claimant, Metcalf & Eddy,1 liable to the plaintiffs, Albert Sandella and his wife, Cheryl Sandella, for injuries sustained by the named plaintiff, an employee of the town of North Haven, in a slip and fall that occurred while he was working at a wastewater treatment plant in that town in July, 1990. The cross claim defendant, Maguire Group, Inc. (Maguire), appeals from the judgment rendered after the second phase…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Mather v. Griffin HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Curry v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Dreier v. Upjohn Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Ubysz v. DiPietroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. FloydSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- D'ANTUONO v. Service Road Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2011
- Opotzner v. BassConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Best Friends Pet Care, Inc. v. Design Learned, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Hoye v. Dewolfe Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.