Legal Opinion

Castaneda v. Ensign Group, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 15, 2014No. B249119APublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GILBERT, P. J.

A corporation with no employees owns a corporation with employees. If the corporation with no employees exercises some control over the corporation with employees, it also may be the employer of the employees of the corporation it owns.

Plaintiff John Castaneda appeals a summary judgment in favor of defendant The Ensign Group, Inc. (Ensign), in his class action lawsuit. He seeks damages for nonpayment of minimum and overtime wages. We conclude there are triable issues of fact whether Ensign was Castaneda’s employer. We reverse.

FACTS

Castaneda filed a class action complaint…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Martinez v. CombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Estrada v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Tieberg v. Unemployment Ins. App. Bd.California Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Futrell v. Payday California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jacqueline Benjamin v. B & H EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Curry v. Equilon Enters., LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. Turman v. Superior Court of Orange Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. Blair v. Classic Party Rentals, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2021
  5. Christopher J. McBee v. Raytheon Technologies IncorporatedDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API