Legal Opinion
Fechter v. HMW Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 29, 1989No. 89-1249PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
MANSMANN, Circuit Judge.
In this ERISA1 case we are faced with the question of whether the district court properly issued a preliminary injunction against corporate and individual defendants prohibiting them from transferring, selling or in any way dissipating their property except in the ordinary course of business pending the final outcome of a lawsuit in which pension plan participants seek the return of a portion of the distribution of excess assets from the termination of the plan. Because we found the injunction against the personal assets of the individual defendants…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Massachusetts v. MorashSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kershner v. MazurkiewiczCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Donovan v. MazzolaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hoxworth v. Blinder, Robinson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Apollo Technologies Corp. v. Centrosphere Industrial Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
- Jacobson v. Hughes Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Gruntal & Co., Inc. v. SteinbergDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- Fechter v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.