Legal Opinion

Borough of Alpine v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 28, 1990No. 596-89CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NETTESHEIM, Judge.

This case is before the court after argument on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. To be decided is the issue whether a final decision letter addressed to the officer of a corporate local government, the entity being the contracting party, begins the running of the 12-month statute of limitations for a government contract case brought under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613 (1982 & Supp. Ill 1985) (the “CDA”).

FACTS

The following facts are undisputed. Plaintiff the Borough of Alpine (sometimes referred to as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gregory Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  2. Kasler/Continental Heller/Fruin Colnon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
  3. Structural Finishing, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. The Borough of Alpine v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  2. Overall Roofing & Construction Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  3. CPT Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
  4. Hamza v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
  5. Aviation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API