Borough of Alpine v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
This case is before the court after argument on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. To be decided is the issue whether a final decision letter addressed to the officer of a corporate local government, the entity being the contracting party, begins the running of the 12-month statute of limitations for a government contract case brought under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613 (1982 & Supp. Ill 1985) (the “CDA”).
FACTS
The following facts are undisputed. Plaintiff the Borough of Alpine (sometimes referred to as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gregory Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Kasler/Continental Heller/Fruin Colnon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
- Structural Finishing, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
3Cited by6 opinions
- The Borough of Alpine v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Overall Roofing & Construction Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- CPT Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
- Hamza v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Aviation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.