Hamza v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:
This contract dispute is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(1). The court must decide whether a contracting officer’s final decision received by plaintiffs attorney begins the running of the statute of limitations under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (the “CDA”), 41 U.S.C. § 609(a)(3) (1994). For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion is granted, as the statute of limitations prevents the court from exercising its jurisdiction.
FACTS
Plaintiff, Hussam T. Hamza, a resident…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Renda Marine, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Policy Analysis Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Riley & Ephriam Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- SIMS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICESUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
- Sandstone Associates, Inc v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019