Legal Opinion

Hamza v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 19, 1996No. 95-822 CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:

This contract dispute is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(1). The court must decide whether a contracting officer’s final decision received by plaintiffs attorney begins the running of the statute of limitations under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (the “CDA”), 41 U.S.C. § 609(a)(3) (1994). For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion is granted, as the statute of limitations prevents the court from exercising its jurisdiction.

FACTS

Plaintiff, Hussam T. Hamza, a resident…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Renda Marine, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  2. Policy Analysis Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  3. Riley & Ephriam Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  4. SIMS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICESUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
  5. Sandstone Associates, Inc v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API