Legal Opinion

Betz v. Maier

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 15, 1896No. 1382PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FISHER, Chief Justice.

An iron safe belonging to the appellant was levied upon by attachment for a debt due by him to appellee; at that time he was a single man and was an insurance agent, and used the safe in which to deposit his notes and insurance policies and other papers, pertaining to his business as insurance agent. The trial court rendered judgment against the appellant for the debt and foreclosed the attachment lien on the safe. The question presented for decision is,, was the iron safe exempt from forced sale?

The statute that relates to exemptions in favor of those who are not the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Queen Insurance v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Alsup & Thompson v. JordanTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. May v. SloanSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. P. J. Willis & Bro. v. MorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Cobbs v. ColemanTexas Supreme Court · 1855

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. 1st American Systems, Inc. v. RezattoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Georgia State Board of Examiners in Optometry v. Friedmans' Jewelers Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  3. Roy v. Mutual Rice Co. of Louisiana, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  4. Cummings v. Pennsylvania Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  5. Hinckley-Tandy Leather Co. v. HazelwoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API