Legal Opinion

Hinckley-Tandy Leather Co. v. Hazelwood

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 23, 1931No. 793PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFunderburk, J.

This is an appeal from an order overruling a motion to dissolve a temporary injunction. Hinckley-Tandy Leather Company, having a judgment against W. W. Hazelwood, caused to be seized under execution and advertised for sale one progressive finishing machine belonging to said Hazelwood. Suit was brought by Hazelwood to enjoin the sale and to recover damages. The petition, naming Hinckley-Tandy Leather Company and H. W. Sayle as defendants, alleged that said “Progressive Finishing Machine” was exempt from execution, in that plaintiff was the head of a family and engaged in conducting and running…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. P. J. Willis & Bro. v. MorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Green v. RaymondTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Betz v. MaierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  4. Saint Louis Type Foundry v. International Live Stock, Printing & Publishing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Mueller v. RichardsonTexas Supreme Court · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Puerto Rico Ilustrado, Inc. v. BuscagliaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1945
  2. Leonard Meritz and Paul D. Freed, Bankrupts v. Phil Palmer, Jr., TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  3. McMillan v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  4. In Re SiegmannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  5. Moore v. NeylandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API