Legal Opinion
Miller v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided September 13, 2006No. 03-04-00218-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOB PEMBERTON, Justice.
A jury found appellant Harold Miller guilty of capital murder in the course of committing or attempting to commit robbery. See Tex. PemCode Ann. § 19.03(a)(2) (West Supp.2005). The State did not seek the death penalty, and the district court assessed punishment at life imprisonment. Appellant contends the trial court erred by: (1) admitting evidence seized during a warrantless search of his bedroom; (2) admitting cell phone billing records that were not properly authenticated, were hearsay, and violated his confrontation rights; (3) admitting custodial statements…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Black v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
- Texas Ear Nose & Throat Consultants, PLLC, Joseph Edmonds, Newton Duncan and James Albright v. John K. Jones M.D.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Hugo Andy Martinez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
- John David Signorelli v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2008
- Marquais Deshawn Gatewood v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.