Legal Opinion

Nance v. Long

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 8, 1959No. 384PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee CuRiam.

Plaintiff makes two assignments of error: (1) that the charge of the court upon -a phase of the evidence does not comply with the requirements of G.S. 1-180, and (2) that the 'court.erred in denying plaintiff’s motion to set the verdict aside as being contrary to the weight of the evidence. This was :a case for the jury, and the court submitted it upon proper issues. When the .charge of the court is considered eontexual'ly as a whole, as we are required to do, it is clear that the learned Judge declared and explained the law .arising on all .phases of the evidence. Motor Co. v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Roberts v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Motor Co. v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Coletrane v. ChristianCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Abbitt v. BartlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Brown v. ScismCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Bryant v. RussellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. MerrittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API