Legal Opinion

Abbitt v. Bartlett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 24, 1960No. 98PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMooRe, J.

After the jurors had begun their deliberations they returned to the courtroom for further instructions. The following transpired: ' '

“JUROR: Would you define malicious for us again, please?
“THE COURT: Now, Ladiies and Gentlemen of the Jury, malice does not necessarily mean ill-will, anger, resentment or a revengeful spirit. To be sure those things are malice, but simply it means a wrongful act knowingly and intentionaly done, without just cause or excuse or justification.
“JUROR: Answer that second question again, please, that second paragraph.
“THE COURT: It means in addition to ill-will,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Stanford v. . Grocery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Steelman v. . BenfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Miller v. . GreenwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Pettiford v. . MayoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  5. Wright v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Downey Venture v. LMI Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Cogdill v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. McCrawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Wehrle v. BrooksDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1966
  5. Lenins v. K-Mart Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API