Legal Opinion
Amos v. Montgomery
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided October 21, 1960PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STANLEY, Commissioner.
We sustain a motion for an appeal from a judgment for $625 against the appellants, B. F. Amos and Marena R. Amos, partners dba Ferrell-Gruber Company, in favor of the appellees, Claude G. Montgomery and Esther B. Montgomery.
In the form of an offer and acceptance, dated April 28, 1951, the appellants agreed to furnish to appellees labor and material to “cover house with Stucco-White Re-Nu-It” for $625. The house is the appellees’ residence. The contract contained these provisions:
“It is agreed that this proposal, properly accepted as above provided, shall constitute the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hopkinsville Motor Company v. MassieCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Myers v. LandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950
- Vandiver v. B. B. Wilson CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Dreyer-Whitehead & Goedecke, Inc. v. LandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
- Myers v. LandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Knecht v. Universal Motor CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
- Knecht v. Universal Motor CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962