Legal Opinion

Myers v. Land

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 27, 1950PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stanley, Commissioner

Affirming.

George Land and Cecil Pox bought a new machine to manufacture concrete blocks from J. C. Myers, doing business as the Central Supply Company, for which they paid $5,624.57. Some accessories or parts were later acquired costing $340.00, which was not paid because of the controversy which subsequently arose.

The suit was filed nearly a year later to recover the purchase price upon the ground that the seller had misrepresented the machine and its ability to do what it *516was designed to do, namely, to manufacture merchantable concrete blocks. An amendment pleaded the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hopkinsville Motor Company v. MassieCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  2. International Harvester Co. of America v. BeanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  3. Graves Ice Cream Co. v. Rudolph W. Wurlitzer Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  4. Frick Co. v. WileyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  5. James v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Zabriskie Chevrolet, Inc. v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. MayesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978
  4. Moreira Constr. Co., Inc. v. Moretrench Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  5. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. LeaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API