Myers v. Land
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
Stanley, Commissioner
Affirming.
George Land and Cecil Pox bought a new machine to manufacture concrete blocks from J. C. Myers, doing business as the Central Supply Company, for which they paid $5,624.57. Some accessories or parts were later acquired costing $340.00, which was not paid because of the controversy which subsequently arose.
The suit was filed nearly a year later to recover the purchase price upon the ground that the seller had misrepresented the machine and its ability to do what it *516was designed to do, namely, to manufacture merchantable concrete blocks. An amendment pleaded the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hopkinsville Motor Company v. MassieCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- International Harvester Co. of America v. BeanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Graves Ice Cream Co. v. Rudolph W. Wurlitzer Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
- Frick Co. v. WileyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
- James v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
3Cited by13 opinions
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Zabriskie Chevrolet, Inc. v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Ford Motor Co. v. MayesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978
- Moreira Constr. Co., Inc. v. Moretrench Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. LeaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.